Friday, February 29, 2008
Dorothea Rockburne
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/439df/439df4122e9ae25b159a76c016c91eef438aad68" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a511c/a511c621d6406d9f1f92406fa58f0c9c370405e1" alt=""
Her early materials include graphite, cardboard, crude oil, chipboard and nails. i think this work is so elegant and so "felt," especially standing in front of the huge slabs or drapes or drafting tables or whatever they are. Her later work is a little on the "eh..." side. She was heavily interested in math, science and astronomy and has spent most of her later career making cosmos-esque paintings that have none of the strength in A, C and D. She turns away from "felt" materials and instead uses traditional paints on mostly handmade papers. Eh.... I am guessing her Black Mountain days finely tuned her Martian sensibilities, making work about physicality and strength and with a limited palette. Since then, it seems, she has turned Venetian. She is more in her head, more sensual and dependent on color and line. These are just my initial thoughts after seeing her work for the first time.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35bad/35bad3aac48e190ffdb3e95884df3c25e7a3c6eb" alt=""
Friday, February 22, 2008
We are in love
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/396ef/396ef3f2722fcd6f597c22325bf4899e541e2bbf" alt=""
Staying Indoors Today
It's so crummy out today. The one time i left the house i found out my new boots are not actually waterproof (i stepped directly into a six-inch deep slush puddle) AND i got caught in the crossfire of a snowball fight. I still can't get over that those kids laughed when it hit me. Why not say sorry? Because hitting white ladies with snowballs is funny. The other day when i was walking Walter, a kid ran up behind him and yelled at him. Scaring the living shit out of an obviously dilapidated dog was hilarious to him. What the hell is wrong with kids? Leave my dog alone. I'm getting a BB gun tomorrow....
Sunday, February 17, 2008
A Gay WHAT?
A Gay BOMB. That's right. I just happened to be up last night reading about this year's winners of the Ig Nobel Prize and came across a particularly disturbing winner. The Air Force Wright Laboratory in Dayton, Ohio was awarded the 2007 Ig Nobel Peace Prize for suggesting research and development for a "gay bomb," which would cause same sex enemy troops to get freaky with one another. What? Now, the fact that they won the Ig Nobel Peace Prize this year is perfectly fitting. Ig Nobel is a play on the word ignoble, meaning not noble, not honorable and just plain stupid. So the award is not the disturbing issue. What is killing me softly is knowing that the United States Air Force proposed a $7.5 million dollar research project to develop the so-called "gay-bomb." This originally happened in 1994, the same year Clinton tried to openly admit gays into the military and then embarassingly settled on "don't ask, don't tell." Knowledge of the Gay Bomb proposal didn't reach mainstream media until 2005 but has regenerated attention with the 2007 prize. It is encouraging to know our military is going to absurd lengths to develop non-lethal weapons. The obvious problem is that the gay bomb proposal exposes profound institutional ignorance and hatred of homosexuality.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a055/5a05560ca6bf28552fd0a4ced4025fa77e5f1c51" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25631/25631651ece3d2ac16a39adf975a5cd686c80b76" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3479/d3479a2382afed1191131cca18f7fd5f39e688c1" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/625fe/625fe23b628926824d03e556d9bef24b299601a3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a308/6a308160b821f75b8b8d0cd0889e73a00bd682c1" alt=""
Saturday, February 16, 2008
Sunday, February 10, 2008
crazy for rachel
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67c55/67c554b42927d44a9dc9f7515efb2652145b7fc5" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d160/7d160ee4b48cc04c26fb47fb7bf0ffb7d5db3767" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3472/d3472c7440cfb35c9344654078746d2f701cf267" alt=""
if the apocalypse were to happen today Rachel Harrison would be in the streets scavenging for sculptural fodder. i think that's what excites me about her work. she has completely convinced me that grotesquely-painted polystyrene forms and debris from our commercial culture go together like tires and stuffed goats. http://www.centrepompidou.fr/education/ressources/ENS-rauschenberg/ENS-rauschenberg.htm
maybe she is just the Robert Rauschenberg of her generation and maybe that's just what her generation needs. my generation needs. we all may need. she's 42, by the way and not necessarily so new to the art world's mainstream. She's had solo shows at both the Milwaukee Museum of Art and the SFMOMA in the early 00's. I have heard from a personal source that she is a force to be reckoned with. By that, i mean that she is fierce about her choices with her work and most likely wouldn't take well to a curator's constructive criticism. In New York her work can be seen in the New Museum's inaugural show Unmonumental, in Two Years at the Whitney and in some corner of the MOMA, i don't remember where.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)